arxiv: v1 [hepph] 22 Jun 2008


 Marilynn Summers
 7 days ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Preprint typeset in JHEP style  HYPER VERSION arxiv: v1 [hepph] 22 Jun 2008 Majorana neutrinos from warped extra dimensions Klaas Brakke and Elisabetta Pallante Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands Abstract: Field theory in the presence of extra dimensions has offered interesting solutions to the gauge hierarchy problem, and inspired many attempts to understand the fermion mass generation mechanism. We study the behaviour of a bulk fermion field subject to nonstandard boundary conditions under Z 2 symmetry in a slice of AdS 5. These pseudomajorana boundary conditions relate the 5d spinor fields to their 5d charge conjugate and generate Majorana spinors in fourdimensions. There is a zero mode localized on the visible brane and the masses of KaluzaKlein excitations are naturally of order the weakscale. We make connection to neutrino phenomenology. We also demonstrate that, contrary to previous claims, a bulk singlet scalar field cannot provide a successful mechanism to generate a suppressed Majorana mass for Standard Model neutrinos localized on the visible brane. Keywords: Physics beyond the Standard Model, Neutrino physics, Extra dimensions, Majorana spinors.
2 1. Introduction Theories with extra spatial dimensions have received great attention during the past decade, offering plausible solutions to the gauge hierarchy problem[1], and inspiring many attempts to understand the fermion mass generation mechanism. Large flat extra dimensions [2] can provide a suppression mechanism of fermion masses via a reduction of Yukawa couplings by a volume factor 1/ V, where V is the volume of the compact extra dimensional space [2]. Many attempts have been considered in this context to generate small masses for the Standard Model neutrinos, see e.g. [3, 4, 5]. Interesting alternatives arise when a nonfactorizable geometry is considered[1, 6, 7].In this case the background metric entangles the four dimensional space to the extra dimensions via warp factors e k y induced by the (constant) curvature k of the extra spatial dimensions y. The role of the volume of large flat extra dimensions is now played by the warp factor, without implying stringent constraints on the size of the extra dimension. A particularly successful construction has been proposed in [1] where an AdS 5 space has been considered with the fifth dimension y circularly compactified on a radius R and orbifolded to S 1 /Z 2. The orbifold fixed points y = 0 and y = πr can be identified with 3branes with positive and negative tension: the Planck (or invisible) brane at y = 0 and the TeV (or visible) brane at y = πr. Any fundamental mass parameter m 0 in the original theory will be converted to an effective mass parameter m m 0 e kπr on the visible brane, via the warping action of the slice of AdS 5 between the two branes. For kr 11 all masses of particles confined to the visible brane are naturally of order the weak scale. One of the long standing questions in particle physics remains the one of finding a mechanism that naturally explains the apparent hierarchy of fermion masses in the Standard Model and why neutrino masses are much smaller than all charged lepton masses. The addition of extra dimensions offers many new possibilities, along with new challenges: the suppression of additional operators might become a far more complicated task in an extra dimensional framework. Any plausible mechanism of generation of observed phenomena, must also guarantee a suppression of processes like proton decay, flavour changing neutral currents and lepton flavour violation. Many interesting attempts have been made along the years in order to explain the smallness of neutrino masses with mechanisms induced by the presence of extra dimensions. This has been done by adding fermion fields to the bulk and maintaining their Dirac nature [8], or by adding a Majorana mass term [9] or considering higher dimensional Majorana couplings [10], or adding extra scalar fields to induce a small Majorana mass on the visible brane [11]. The dynamics of bulk fermion, scalar and vector fields has been extensively considered in a supersymmetric context in e.g. [12, 13]. In this paper we consider a particular mechanism to generate a Majorana spinor on the visible brane by imposing a Z 2 transformation property of the bulk fermion fields which mixes the fields and their charge conjugates, analogously to the Majorana condition in four dimensions. This boundary condition is tailored for neutrinos, and it is the generalization to a warped geometry of the boundary conditions first proposed in [14] in the case of flat extra dimensions. We show how these pseudomajorana boundary conditions far more 1
3 constrain the KaluzaKlein spectrum with respect to the ordinary Z 2 boundary conditions when reducing from five to four dimensions. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we describe the framework, impose the pseudomajorana boundary conditions and derive the KaluzaKlein spectrum of the theory. Here we build the connection between the 5D and the 4D charge conjugation operators and we show that the boundary conditions generate one Majorana spinor with peculiar properties induced by the warped geometry. In Section 3 we attempt some more phenomenological considerations, identifying the bulk Majorana spinor with a sterile neutrino or with a Majorana Standard Model neutrino. In Section 4 we summarize alternative attempts to generate small Majorana masses and we reconsider the derivation of ref. [11]. Our conclusions are in Section Bulk fermions with pseudomajorana boundary conditions We consider a scenario with one extra dimension as first introduced in ref. [1]. The fifth dimension y is circularly compactified on a radiusrand orbifolded to S 1 /Z 2 on the interval πr y πr. The background metric is nonfactorizable and describing a slice of AdS 5. The orbifold fixed points are y = 0 and πr which can be naturally intepreted as the location of two 3branes, where the stressenergy tensor solution of the Einstein s equation is non zero. The Planck scale brane is located at y = 0 and the Tev or visible brane is located at y = πr. This thinbrane case can also be understood as the limiting behaviour of a thick domainwall solution. The action for a spin1/2 Dirac fermion ψ living in the bulk is the Dirac action generalized to curved fivedimensional space with constant curvature and can be written as follows S = d 4 x dy g ( i ψg MN γ M D M ψ m ψψ ), (2.1) where g = det(g MN ) = e 8σ is the determinant of the metric tensor with σ = k y and k the constant curvature along the fifth dimension. We use capital indices M,N... for objects defined in curved space and lowercase greek indices µ,ν,...α,β for objects defined in the tangent frame: in our notation µ = 0,1,2,3 and M = (µ,5). A lineelement solution of the Einstein s equations in fivedimensions, which respects fourdimensional Poincare invariance, is given by [1] ds 2 = e 2σ η µν dx µ dx ν +dy 2, (2.2) with flat metric tensor η µν = ( 1,1,1,1) and µ,ν = 0,1,2,3. The warp factor e 2σ entangles the four dimensional spacetime to the fifth dimension y rendering the geometry nonfactorizable. This is a special case of an AdS 5 geometry. This solution can only be trusted if k < M, i.e. the bulk curvature is small compared with the fundamental Planck scale. The gamma matrices γ M are the curved space Dirac matrices, γ M = (γ µ,γ 5 ) 1. They are related to the flat space ones through the vielbein e M α, γm = e M α γα with e M α = (e σ,e σ,e σ,e σ,1). 1 We use the Dirac representation of the gamma matrices unless differently stated 2
4 We have introduced the covariant derivative acting on the fermion field in curved space D M = M +Γ M, where Γ M is the spin connection 2 Γ µ = 1 2 γ 5γ µ dσ dy Γ 5 = 0. (2.3) For the sake of simplicity, we do not consider a bulk gauge field coupled to the bulk fermion in this paper. An investigation of this case for flat extra dimensions can be found in ref. [14]. We have introduced a bulk mass term with mass m for the fermion field. The mass m can be typically generated by scalar fields acquiring a vacuum expectation value in the higher dimensional theory. It is in general complex valued m = m e iα, however its phase is irrelevant at this level, since we can always rotate the Wyel spinors by a phase which cancels the phase in the mass term and leaves the action invariant. Hence, we can set m = m without loss of generality. The invariance of the bulk mass term under the Z 2 parity transformation y y can be guaranteed in two ways: the mass m and the scalar fermion bilinear ψψ are both odd or both even underaz 2 parity transformation. A Z 2 odd mass parameter can be explained as the vev of a scalar field with an odd kink profile. The vacuum configuration of the scalar field resembles in this case the background 3form field in the dimensional reduction of the HoravaWitten theory [15]. The Z 2 even case appears when pseudomajorana boundary conditions are imposed, as it will be discussed in the following. The odd case A Z 2 odd mass parameter is required when ordinary boundary conditions for the bulk fermion fields are imposed. These have been extensively considered in the literature [8, 12]. The bulk Dirac field transforms under Z 2 as ψ(x, y) = ±γ 5 ψ(x,y), (2.4) where the sign can only be determined by the fermion interactions. This transformation property implies that the fermion scalar bilinear ψψ is odd under Z 2, ψ( y)ψ( y) = ψ(y)ψ(y). The invariance of the action under Z 2 thus requires a Z 2 odd mass of the type m(y) = mǫ(y) with ǫ(y) the sign function. Given that the left and righthanded components of the Dirac field satisfy ψ L,R = γ 5 ψ L,R, ordinary boundary conditions will imply that the Lhanded field is Z 2 odd and the Rhanded field even, or viceversa. The odd component will vanish at the fixed points of the orbifolding y = 0 and y = πr  where πr is indentified with πr 3. The odd bulk mass term vanishes at the boundaries y = 0,±πR. Thus we conclude that the most general mass term allowed by ordinary boundary conditions contains a bulk contribution and no boundary terms. 2 This is in agreement with ref. [12] and one can easily check this to be equivalent to the prescription derived in ref. [8]. 3 The orbifolding condition that identifies fields at y = πr and y = πr is equivalent to periodic boundary conditions imposed on universal flat dimensions of size L, i.e. ψ(y) = ψ(y + L). 3
5 The even case TheZ 2 even casehasinsteadaneven massparamatermandaneven fermionbilinearwhich does not vanish at the orbifold fixed points, so that both a bulk mass contribution and a boundary contribution are in general allowed. We consider an especially suitable type of unordinary boundary conditions, first introduced in ref. [14] in the context of universal flat extra dimensions. We call them pseudomajorana boundary conditions, since they relate the bulk fermion field to its chargeconjugate field in the fivedimensional theory and they are able to generate the Majorana condition ψ = ψ c back into four dimensions. The pseudomajorana boundary conditions are imposed on the Dirac fields living in the 5D bulk as follows ψ(x, y) = e iδ γ 5 ψ c (x,y), (2.5) where a phase factor is allowed in the most general case, and ψ c = C ( ψ) T is the charge conjugate field with C( C 5 ) the charge conjugation matrix of the five dimensional theory. At this point we only need to know the following properties of C: C = C T = C 1 = C C Γ a C 1 = Γ T a, Γ a = (γ µ,γ 5 ), (2.6) while in section (2.4) we shall state the relation between the 5D charge conjugation operator and the charge conjugation operator in four dimensions. A valid matrix representation of the 5D charge conjugation operator in Dirac or Wyel basis is C = γ 1 γ 3. It is clear that any boundary condition which induces a mixing of a fermion field and its charge conjugate will only be allowed for electricallyneutral fields, and this is the case of neutrinos. Any additional U(1) symmetry, under which the fermion is charged, will be broken by the boundary conditions in eq. (2.5). In order to make connection to the charge conjugate field, notice that the action in eq. (2.1) can equivalently be written in terms of the field ψ and its charge conjugate in a compact form, also extensively used in ref. [14] S = d 4 x dy g ( i Ψg MN γ M D N Ψ ΨMΨ ), (2.7) where we have defined the following vector of fields and mass matrix ( ψ c) ( ) m 0 Ψ = M =. (2.8) ψ 0 m To derive eq. (2.7) one observes that the action of the 5D charge conjugation operator implies (ψ c ) c = ψ, hence ψψ = ψ c ψ c and ψγ M D M ψ = ψ c γ M D M ψ c. These identities lead straightforwardly to the form of eq. (2.7). The pseudomajorana boundary condition on the vector of fields Ψ reads as follows Ψ(x, y) = σ 1 e iσ 3δ γ 5 Ψ(x,y) = σ 3 e iσ 3δ γ 5 Ψ c (x,y). (2.9) ThevectoroffieldsΨ(x,y)isalsosubjecttoperiodicboundaryconditions, sothatψ(x,πr) = Ψ(x, πr). This is a very natural condition to impose. However, this type of constraint can also be generalized, see for example [14]. 4
6 We perform a KaluzaKlein decomposition of the 5D fields in order to be able to derive an action for fermions in fourdimensions. We have the choice of working in terms of the fields ψ and ψ c, or in terms of L and Rhanded fields ψ L,R, or in terms of the vector of fields Ψ. We choose to decompose the 5D fields in terms of L and Rhanded components to keep our derivation easily comparable with the Dirac case of ordinary boundary conditions extensively analyzed in the literature [8, 12]. We write ψ L,R (x,y) = 1 2πR n=0 ψ n,l,r (x)e 2σ ˆfn,L,R (y), (2.10) where in the most general case the ydependent functions ˆf n,l,r (y) are complex valued, and subject to the specific boundary conditions. The same decomposition for the charge conjugate field ψ c (x,y) = C ψ T (x,y) = Cγ 0 ψ (x,y) reads (ψ L,R ) c (x,y) = 1 2πR n=0 (ψ n,l,r ) c (x)e 2σ ˆf n,l,r (y) (2.11) and the identity (ψ c ) L,R = (ψ R,L ) c holds under the action of the 5D charge conjugation operator. 2.1 Imposing PseudoMajorana boundary conditions The boundary conditions in eq. (2.5) constrain the functions ˆf n,l,r (y) through the Kaluza Klein decomposition of eqs. (2.10) and (2.11), so that one only independent function remains, associated to one 4D Weyl spinor analogously to what happens when imposing the Majorana condition in four dimensions. Writing eq. (2.5) in terms of L and Rhanded fields we obtain e iδ ψ L (x, y) = (ψ c ) L (x,y) = (ψ R ) c (x,y) e iδ ψ R (x, y) = +(ψ c ) R (x,y) = +(ψ L ) c (x,y). (2.12) When deriving the boundary conditions on the KK fields we have the choice to absorb the phase factor e iδ into a) the constraints on the 4D fields ψ n (x) or into b) the constraints on the ydependent functions ˆf n (y). Clearly, both choices are equivalent. In the first case one has and ψ n (x) = e iδ γ 5 ψ c n(x) (2.13) e iδ ψ n,l (x) = (ψ c n ) L(x) = (ψ n,r ) c (x) e iδ ψ n,r (x) = (ψ c n ) R(x) = (ψ n,l ) c (x), (2.14) while the functions ˆf n,l,r (y) must satisfy the relation ˆf n,l,r ( y) = ˆf n,r,l (y), (2.15) 5
7 therefore leaving one independent function, as expected. In the second case, one has ψ n (x) = γ 5 ψ c n (x) and ˆf n,l,r ( y) = e iδ ˆf n,r,l (y). When instead ordinary boundary conditions are imposed, the Dirac nature of the 5D fermion fields is preserved and the two ydependent functions ˆf n,l,r are subject to the constraints ˆf n,l,r ( y) = ˆf n,l,r (y), or viceversa. In both cases, and after KaluzaKlein decomposition, the periodic boundary conditions ψ L,R (x,πr) = ψ L,R (x, πr) lead to ˆf n,l,r (πr) = ˆf n,l,r ( πr), implying that odd functions of the fifth coordinate will vanish at the boundaries ±πr Boundary conditions in terms of Weyl spinors. Wecandecomposethe5DDiracspinorψ = ψ L +ψ R intermsofalhandedandarhanded Weyl spinor as follows ( ) ( ) φ 0 ψ L = ψ R = 0 ǫξ, (2.16) χ where ǫ iσ 2. Charge conjugation in 5D is realized by Working in the Weyl basis with γ 0 = C = γ 1 γ 3 = iσ 2 ½ = ( ) 0 ½ and γ 5 = ½ 0 ( ǫχ ψ c (x,y) = Cγ 0 ψ ) = ǫφ ( ) ǫ 0. (2.17) 0 ǫ ( ) ½ 0 we obtain 0 ½ and the pseudomajorana boundary conditions thus imply (in the simplified case δ = 0) φ(x, y) = ǫχ (x,y) (2.18) χ(x, y) = ǫφ (x,y). (2.19) The boundary condition ψ(x) = γ 5 ψ c (x) on the 4D fields implies φ(x) = ǫχ (x) χ(x) = ǫφ (x). (2.20) The 4D spinor can hence be written in terms of one Weyl spinor ψ(x) = ( ) φ(x) ǫφ = (x) ( ǫχ ) (x) χ(x) (2.21) under the 5D pseudomajorana conditions. 4 Notice that in the most general case a phase factor is allowed, so that ψ L,R(x,πR) = e iα ψ L,R(x, πr). Antiperiodic boundary conditions have been considered in ref. [13] in a supersymmetric scenario. 6
8 2.3 The action in four dimensions We determine the spectrum of the KK modes, their masses and wave functions, by solving an eigenvalue problem which can be obtained once an ansatz for the 4D fermion action is imposed to the 5D action in eq. (2.1). The problem is: find the eigenfunctions ˆf n,l,r and the associated eigenvalues of a ydependent differential operator, subject to the given boundary conditions. After rewriting the 5D action in terms of L and Rhanded fields S = d 4 x dy g ψ(x,y) ( ie σ /+2γ 5 σ γ 5 5 m ) ψ(x,y) = d 4 x dy g { ψl (x,y)ie σ /ψ L (x,y)+ ψ R (x,y)ie σ /ψ R (x,y)+ + ψ R (x,y)( 2σ + 5 m)ψ L (x,y)+ ψ L (x,y)(2σ 5 m)ψ R (x,y) }, (2.22) and performing the KaluzaKlein decomposition according to eq. (2.10) S = d 4 1 x dy { ψn,l (x)i /ψ m,l (x)ˆf 2πR n,le σ ˆfm,L + ψ n,r (x)i /ψ m,r (x)ˆf n,re σ ˆfm,R + n,m + ψ n,r (x)ψ m,l (x)ˆf n,r( 5 m)ˆf m,l + ψ } n,l (x)ψ m,r (x)ˆf n,l( 5 m)ˆf m,r (2.23) we require that the effective 4D action is given by S 4D = d 4 x [ ψn i /ψ n L(m n ) ], (2.24) n with a Majorana mass term L(m n ). This is guaranteed by the presence of the pseudo Majorana boundary conditions. The form of the 4D kinetic term in eq. (2.24) and the use of the pseudomajorana boundary conditions imply the following normalization and orthonormality condition on the ydependent functions 1 πr dye σ ˆf 2πR n,l,r (y)ˆf m,l,r (y) = 1 πr 2 δ n,m. (2.25) The most general 4D Majorana mass term involving one Majorana spinor can be conveniently expressed as a function of L or Rhanded fields and in terms of the 4D charge conjugate fields. This reads L(m n ) = m n ( ψ c L ψ L + ψ L ψ c L) n or m n ( ψ c R ψ R + ψ R ψ c R) n, (2.26) where we defined ψ c L,R (ψ L,R) c and the charge conjugate fields are now ψ c = C 4 ( ψ) T, where C 4 is the charge conjugation matrix in four dimensions. 2.4 Charge conjugation from five to four dimensions Once the Clifford algebra is built for a given number of spacetime dimensions d = t +s, with t timelike and s spacelike dimensions, there always exists a charge conjugation matrix C, such that [16] C T = ǫc Γ T a = ηcγ ac 1 (2.27) 7
9 for ǫ = ±1 and η = ±1, and {Γ a,γ b } = 2η ab defines the Clifford algebra in the given spacetime. A formal proof and further details can be found in [16, 17, 18]. The unitarity of the charge conjugation matrix C = C 1 is true in any representation, while the charge conjugation matrix not necessarily squares to ½. What it is relevant to observe is that for odd dimensions only one of the two choices, η = +1 or η = 1, can be used [16]. While in d = 4 the two solutions ǫ = +1, η = +1 and ǫ = +1, η = 1 are allowed, in d = 5 only the solution ǫ = +1, η = 1 can be realized. An often used realization of the charge conjugation in d = 4 is C = iγ 2 γ 0, which satisfies C = C T = C 1 = C C 2 = ½ Cγ µ C 1 = (γ µ ) T. (2.28) This choice gives the relation γ 5 C 5 = C 4. In the most general case we can choose a charge conjugation matrix in four dimensions with a phase factor, such that C 4 = ηγ 2 γ 0, and η 2 = 1. The matrix C 4 satisfies the following relations C = C 1 = (η ) 2 C C T = C C 2 = η 2 ½ Cγ µ C 1 = (γ µ ) T, (2.29) and it is immediate to verify that γ 5 C 5 = iη C 4. In the case in which the phase factor e iδ of eq. (2.5) is absorbed into the boundary conditions for the 4D fields, they will satisfy the following relation ψ(x) = e iδ γ 5 C 5 ψt (x) = iη e iδ C 4 ψt (x) = iη e iδ ψ c (x), (2.30) implying the usual Majorana condition in four dimensions, generalized with a phase factor coming from the freedom in the choice of 5D boundary conditions and the freedom in the construction of the charge conjugation matrix in four dimensions. Eq. (2.30) leads to the identitites ψ R ψ L = iη e iδ ψr ψ c R = iηe iδ ψc L ψ L ψ L ψ R = iη e iδ ψl ψ c L = iηe iδ ψc R ψ R, (2.31) thus implying that the 5D action in eq. (2.23) generates a 4D Majorana mass term if subject to pseudomajorana boundary conditions. Equivalently, the phase factor e iδ can instead be absorbed into the boundary conditions for ˆf L,R (y). 2.5 Solutions to the eigenvalue problem In order to obtain the 4D action in eq. (2.24) the ydependent functions ˆf n,l,r must be solutions of the equations ( 5 +m)ˆf n,l (y) = iη e iδ m n e σ ˆfn,R (y) ( 5 +m)ˆf n,r (y) = iη e iδ m n e σ ˆf n,l (y), (2.32) 8
10 on theinterval [ πr,πr], with real masses m,m n and ˆf n,l,r complex functions, differently from the ordinary Dirac case. Notice that the Z 2 invariance of the 5D action implies that we can restrict all ydependent integrations from 0 to πr and the behaviour of the solutions for negative y should be fully determined by their Z 2 transformation properties. The solutions must also satisfy the pseudomajorana boundary conditions ˆf n,l,r ( y) = ˆf n,r,l (y) and periodic boundary conditions ˆf n,l,r ( πr) = ˆf n,l,r (πr). As anticipated, we can equivalently choose to remove the phase factor e iδ from equations (2.32), while imposing the boundary conditions ˆf n,l,r ( y) = e iδ ˆf n,r,l (y). We choose to illustrate this second case, in which we also set iη = 1, so that ψ n (x) = ψn(x) c is satisfied. With these substitutions, equations (2.32) should then be solved separately for the real and imaginary parts, giving ( 5 +m)reˆf n,l (y) = m n e σ Reˆf n,r (y) ( 5 +m)reˆf n,r (y) = m n e σ Reˆf n,l (y), (2.33) and the equations for the imaginary parts are obtained by replacing Ref L,R Imf L,R. Notice that eqs. (2.33) together with periodic boundary conditions tell us that we should seek for solutions with definite and opposite Z 2 parity, i.e. Reˆf n,l (y) even and Reˆf n,r (y) odd or viceversa. This constrains the phase δ of the boundary conditions and the shape of the bulk mass parameter m. For real e iδ the pseudomajorana conditions imply that Ref L and Ref R always carry the same parity (the same being true for the imaginary parts). This condition only allows for the zero mode solution of eqs. (2.33) to survive, thus m n = 0, the mass term m = 0 and ˆf 0,L (y) = ˆf 0,R (y) const. For imaginary e iδ the entire KaluzaKlain tower is allowed; the pseudomajorana boundary condition implies in this case that Reˆf L and Imˆf R have the same parity, and opposite to Reˆf R and Imˆf L, a condition always compatible with eqs. (2.33). We expect that the complete solutions ˆf n,l,r (y) will be plane waves  the solutions of the flat case [14]  deformed by the warped geometry. Some more subtleties arise from the comparison with the ordinary Dirac case as it is shown below. The solutions Solutions to eqs. (2.33) can conveniently be found by deriving a second order partial differential equation which decouples the L and Rhanded modes, in complete analogy with what has been done in refs. [12, 8]. The coupled equations (2.32) are equivalent to the following second order partial differential equation on the interval [ πr, πr] ( e σ 5 e σ 5 +M 2) Reˆf n,l,r (y) = m 2 ne 2σ Reˆf n,l,r (y), (2.34) with the masslike term M 2 given by M 2 = mσ ±m +m 2, (2.35) where σ = kǫ(y) and the upper (lower) sign for the L (R) modes. The form of M 2 depends on the shape of the bulk mass parameter m. In the ordinary Dirac case [12, 8] the bulk 9
11 mass must be Z 2 odd, thus usually defined as m = cσ proportional to the derivative of the warp factor. In the pseudomajorana case the bulk mass is Z 2 even, and we can in general allow for a bulk and a boundary contribution. However, no further calculation is needed while noticing that for m even the masslike term M 2 will carry mixed parity. Hence, for any choice of m even, a definite Z 2 parity solution to (2.33) only exists for m = 0. This seems to be a genuine consequence of the warped AdS 5 geometry with the extra dimension compactified on a S 1 /Z 2 orbifold. We expect that some of these constraints might be released for more general choices of the geometry of extra dimensions, for example in the flat case [14]. It is convenient torewrite eq. (2.34) in terms of thenew variablex = e σ m n /k, andmaintain for a few steps more the explicit dependence upon the masslike parameter M 2. We obtain ( ) x 2 2 f n x 2 + σ k 2x f n M 2 x k 2 x 2 f n (x) = 0. (2.36) The boundary terms, proportional to σ = 2k(δ(y) δ(y πr)), should be treated separately and depend on the form of M 2. Thus we seek for the general solution of ( ) x 2 2 f n ˆM2 x 2 k 2 x 2 f n (x) = 0, (2.37) where the reduced masslike term ˆM 2 is obtained by subtracting the boundary terms. As noticed in ref. [12] afurtherredefinitionf(x) = e σ/2 f(x) reducesequation (2.37) to abessel equation for f n (x) x 2 2 fn x 2 +x f ( ) n ˆM2 x k x 2 f n (x) = 0 (2.38) the most general solution of which is a linear combination of Bessel functions J α (x) and Y α (x) of order α = ˆM 2 /k 2 +1/4, for x real [12, 8]. The complete solutions f n (y) are thus given by f n (y) = eσ/2 [ ( mn ( J α N n k eσ) mn +b α (m n )Y α k eσ)], (2.39) with normalization factor N 2 n = 2 πr πr πr dye 2σ( J α ( mn k eσ) +b α (m n )Y α ( mn k eσ)) 2, (2.40) where the coefficients b α (m n ) and the mass spectrum eigenvalues m n are determined by the specific boundary conditions. When ˆM 2 has mixed parity, we must solve eq. (2.38) separately on the two branches y > 0 and y < 0, thus obtaining Bessel functions of different order on the two branches for the same mode n. As already concluded before, the existence of a solution implies that M 2 = 0. The case m = 0, M 2 = 0 is immediately solved, the solutions being Bessel functions of order α = 1/2. They are trigonometric functions J 1/2 (x) = 2/πx sinx 10
12 and Y 1/2 = J 1/2 (x) = 2/πx cosx. The coefficients b 1/2 (m n ) are determined by the boundary conditions at y = 0,πR (the term proportional to σ in eq. (2.36)) df n dy y=0,πr = 0 (2.41) for Z 2 even solutions and f n (y) y=0,πr = 0 (2.42) forz 2 oddsolutions. Inthiscasef n (y) = σ /kf n ( y ) andthecondition f n (0) = f n (πr) = 0 directly implies (2.41). We obtain the simple result b 1/2 (m n ) = for the even solutions and 1 2 J 1/2( mn mn k )+ k J 1/2 (mn k ) 1 2 Y 1/2( mn k )+ mn k Y 1/2 (mn k ) = cot ( mn b 1/2 (m n ) = b 1/2 (m n e πkr ) (2.43) b 1/2 (m n ) = J 1/2( mn k ) ( Y 1/2 ( mn k ) = tan mn ) k b 1/2 (m n ) = b 1/2 (m n e πkr ) (2.44) for the odd solutions respectively, with n = 1,2... Thus the even parity solutions are kπr ( f n (y) = 4(e kπr 1) cos mn ) k (eσ 1) (2.45) and the odd parity solutions are f n (y) = σ k kπr ( 4(e kπr 1) sin mn ) k (eσ 1). (2.46) The same conditions, (2.43) or equivalently (2.44), give the exact spectrum of eigenvalues m n : m n = nπk e kπr. (2.47) 1 e kπr This can be compared with the Dirac case with ordinary boundary conditions, where one gets an estimate in the limit kr 1 and m n k given by [12] m n (n + α/2 3/4)πke kπr for even solutions and m n (n+α/2 1/4)πke kπr for odd solutions, and α = 1/2 in our case. Summarizing, the pseudomajorana boundary conditions imposed on fermions living on a slice of AdS 5 generate a KaluzaKlein tower of Majorana spinors in the four dimensional action. No Dirac type bulk mass term seems to be allowed in this case by the warped geometry with orbifolding. Thephasefactor e iδ in the pseudomajorana boundaryconditions must be chosen along with the choice of the 4D charge conjugation matrix. We have derived the explicit solutions for pseudomajorana boundary conditions given by (imaginary phase) ψ(x, y) = ±iγ 5 ψ c (x,y), with C 4 = iγ 0 γ 2. This induces the Majorana condition k ) 11
13 ψ = ψ c in four dimensions. A massless zero mode exists and all KaluzaKlein modes, including the zero mode, are localized on the visible (y = πr) brane. In the same context, we have noticed that the opposite choice (real phase) ψ(x, y) = ±γ 5 ψ c (x,y) removes all excited states and only allows for a zero mode. For the moment we leave open the question of what mechanism might be in place that favours one choice and not the other. The ydependent wave functions of the Majorana KaluzaKlein tower are deformed plane waves, as expected, and given by kπr ˆf n (y) = 4(e kπr 1) ˆf 0 (y) = ( ( mn cos k (eσ 1) )+i σ ( k sin mn ) ) k (eσ 1) n = 1,2... kπr 4(e kπr 1). (2.48) These results show that the case of bulk fermion fields with pseudomajorana boundary conditions is far more constrained than the ordinary Dirac case. A bulk Majorana mass term can still be added to our case, in analogy to what has been done in the ordinary case in ref. [9]. Again, the mass parameter will acquire opposite Z 2 parity with respect to the ordinary case if pseudomajorana boundary conditions are imposed. Notice finally that in the ordinary Dirac case the localization of the zero modes is monitored by the bulk Dirac mass, which accelerates or reduces the exponential decay of the zero mode ydependent wave function. By tuning the bulk mass parameter one can achieve localization of the zero modes on the Planck brane, delocalization, or localization on the TeV brane. The pseudomajorana case produces a zero mode Majorana spinor which is localized on the TeV brane. 3. Neutrino phenomenology, Dirac or Majorana The main purpose of this paper is the one of solving the exercise of generating Majorana spinors in four dimensions, starting from a five dimensional scenario with a warped geometry and bulk Dirac fermions. We did this by imposing nonstandard pseudomajorana boundary conditions in 5D, instead of the ordinary boundary conditions which preserve the Dirac nature of bulk fermions. This exercise motivates the more phenomenological question of whether the found solution can at all give rise to a plausible mechanism to generate small masses for neutrinos. This is part of the many attempts in the literature at finding a convincing explanation of why the observed masses of fermions, quarks and leptons and in particular neutrinos, are the way they are, respecting a hierarchy among families and with neutrinos much lighter then all their Standard Model partners. The pseudomajorana boundary conditions do not leave much space for tuning. With this mechanism we can generate a zero mode Majorana spinor which is localized on our brane, with or without a KaluzaKlein tower of states. We can either identify the bulk fermion field with a sterile Majorana neutrino, i.e. a neutrino which is not charged under the SM gauge group, or with the Standard Model neutrino. In the first case a well known successful mechanism in four dimensions is the seesaw mechanism, where a sterile 12
14 Rhanded heavy neutrino is added to the particle content of the Standard Model. We might identify the first KaluzaKlein mode (or the tower of KK modes) of the Majorana spinor in the bulk with the heavy sterile neutrino and induce a seesaw mechanism, while all SM particles are localized on the TeV brane. The mass of the KaluzaKlein modes is naturally of the TeV order, and might induce a too small suppression of the SM neutrino masses. However, a complete description of this mechanism can only be achieved with the full understanding of how KaluzaKlein higher modes are entangled to the four dimensional effective theory. This might imply deviations from the assumptions implicit in the KaluzaKlein decomposition. A complete mass term in 4D might be of the type S M = d 4 x m ψc(n) n R ψ(n) R + Y 5 f (n) R (y = πr) L(x) < H > ψ (n) R (x). (3.1) n 1 n 0 The usual seesaw mechanism in four dimensions predicts m light v 2 /M and m heavy M, with v the weakscale vev of the neutral component of the Higgs doublet and M a GUT scale. In the 5D case here discussed, and considering the tower of KaluzaKlein excitations we can generate Dirac masses in the four dimensional theory through Yukawa couplings proportional to Y (n) 5 f (n) R (y = πr)v and Majorana masses m n which are naturally of order the TeV. One needs to know the behaviour of Y (n) 5 f (n) R (y = πr) for the excitations in the KK tower in order to predict a hierarchy of scales. In the simplest scenario in which all couplings and masses are of order the weak scale, no hierarchy will be generated. However, a suppression might be induced by the suppression of the couplings of KK excitations to the visible brane. As a side note we add that in the case in which Majorana masses and Dirac masses are of the same order of magnitude and sufficiently small, the seesaw mass matrix would give rise to large mixing angles, inducing neutrinoantineutrino oscillations of the type ν L (ν R ) c. This would mean oscillations in which the SM neutrinos turn into sterile particles. This alternative idea has been explored long ago in [19, 20]. The depicted scenario can be compared with the Dirac case discussed in ref. [8], where the Rhanded bulk fermion zero mode is identified with a sterile neutrino. In this case the bulk mass term can be used as a free parameter to tune the amount of localization of the zero mode. Above a critical value of the bulk mass (c=1/2) the Z 2 even (Rhanded) zero modeislocalized ontheplanck brane, sothatits wave functionatthetevbraneisstrongly suppressed. By introducing a new Yukawa interaction Y 5 L(x) H(x)ψ (0) (x,y = πr), the four dimensional Yukawa coupling will be given by Y 5 f 0,R (y = πr), with Y 5 = O(1) and the SM neutrino mass induced via the Higgs mechanism m ν Y 5 vf 0,R (y = πr) receives an exponential suppression given by f 0,R (y = πr) the value of the ydependent function at the TeV brane. This beautiful mechanism however requires a finetuning of the bulk mass term. Nevertheless it has been shown [8] to be very effective in producing plausible ranges of neutrino masses and oscillation parameters. The second possibility is to identify bulk fermion fields with SM particles. This implies that gauge fields should also be allowed in the bulk. We do not consider here this possibility, rather we observe that a scenario with all SM fields in the bulk offers many more 13
15 appealing features if supersymmetry is imposed. In the simplest case, and disregarding gauge interactions, the zero mode of the bulk Majorana field can be identified with the SM Lhanded neutrino. Given its Majorana nature, no Yukawa coupling to the Higgs doublet and therefore Dirac mass term can be generated, while a mass term can be induced by the coupling with a Higgs triplet. The smallness of neutrino masses would in this case be explained by the smallness of the Higgs triplet vev, a well known mechanism in the four dimensional theory. The fitted value of the ρ parameter of the Standard Model restricts the ratio of the Higgs triplet to the doublet vevs to be approximately v T /v H < 0.17, thus naturally implying a suppression of neutrino masses with respect to charged SM fermions. In this scenario, the question of the smallness of neutrino masses is moved into the question of the smallness of a Higgs triplet vev and a hierarchy of fermion masses would be due to a hierarchy of scalar boson masses. Alternatively, a mechanism in which higher order radiative corrections give rise to a small mass for the Majorana zero mode remains a viable solution. 4. Other mechanisms to generate small Majorana masses in a warped geometry It is now part of textbooks the list of recipes to follow in order to generate a small neutrino mass in our fourdimensional world. Three possibilities are foreseen i) enlarging the SM lepton sector (e.g. with the addition of an SU(2) singlet Rhanded neutrino), ii) enlarging the SM Higgs sector (e.g. with the addition of a Higgs triplet and extra doublets) and iii) enlarging both. Fermions in the bulk of (compactified) extra dimensions offer an additional mechanism of enhancement or suppression of interactions and generation of mass terms. However, no clear mechanism has been isolated that can explain why neutrino masses are much smaller than charged lepton masses, and most of the proposed mechanisms do rely on a fine tuning procedure. Experimentally, no evidence in favour or against the Majorana nature of neutrinos has been reported, apart from a long debated claim of the Gran Sasso neutrinoless double βdecay experiment. For an up to date analysis of neutrino data see e.g. [21]. Results collected along the years seem to indicate that some relevant ingredient is missing, perhaps a fundamental symmetry principle, a group theory consideration [22, 23] that might explain the recurrence of the threefamily structure in the fermion spectrum of the standard model without the need for a fine tuning. Might a random process have a role in explaining the observed hierachies? It should possibly occur jointly with an enhancement mechanism acting on an initial tiny symmetry breaking effect.an intriguing use of randomness has been made in ref. [24] in order to describe the apparent hierarchy of athmospheric and solar neutrino oscillation parameters. In the context of warped extra dimensions, the main attempts to generate a small Majorana mass for neutrinos on the visible brane, can be summarized as follows: i) Higher dimensional operators such as the operator ψ T CH 2 ψ [10] can induce a Majorana mass term on the visible brane. The suppression of the neutrino mass w.r.t. the charged lepton mass is obtained when the 5D wave function of the zero mode is localized on the Planck brane, similarly towhatoriginally proposedinref.[8]. ii)theadditionofabulkmajoranamasson 14
16 the Planck brane [9] in the case of bulk fermion fields with ordinary boundary conditions can induce an uplifting of the mass of the bulk fermion zero mode, which can thus be identified with the Rhanded heavy neutrino of a seesaw mechanism. iii) Finally the role of additional scalar fields in the bulk has been explored in ref. [11]. Assuming a Lhanded neutrino on the visible brane, we can generate a Majorana mass term via the interaction with an SU(2) Higgs triplet: λ ij L T i C 1 (iτ 2 T)L j, with obvious notation. The vev of the neutral component, call it ξ 0, of the Higgs triplet T will thus induce a Majorana mass term λ ii ξ 0. Therefore, a suppression of the triplet vev w.r.t. the doublet vev would account for a suppression of the Majorana neutrino mass w.r.t. the charged fermion masses. It was concluded in ref. [11] that the introduction of bulk scalar fields would suffice to guarantee a suppressed triplet vev on the visible brane, thus offering a viable mechanism for the generation of a suppressed Majorana mass for SM neutrinos. However, after reconsidering the proposed model, we find[25] that no suppression mechanism can actually be obtained 5. We briefly summarize the most relevant steps of the derivation and provide some physics considerations. The model contains one bulk scalar singlet field S(x, y), a Higgs triplet T(x) and a Higgs doublet H(x) on the visible brane. Denoting with ξ 0 and v the vevs of the neutral triplet and doublet respectively, the desired hierachy of vevs should be ξ 0 v, while the vev of the bulk scalar singlet, call it S 0, should induce such hierarchy. The action for a bulk scalar field has also been derived in ref. [12], where the 5D equations of motion for bulk scalar, vector and fermion fields are represented in a useful compact form. Through power counting, we can write the most general potential for the singlet field and its interactions with the triplet and doublet on the brane, up to and including quartic couplings. The potential we find does agree with that of ref. [11]. The bulk singlet field with a generic mass term ak 2 +bσ a bulk and a boundary contributions are allowed by Z 2 invariance has a zero mode if b = 2 α, with α = 4+a. This relation between the bulk and boundary terms can be justified in the supersymmetric limit [12]. As a consequence, the localization of the singlet zero mode is driven by the parameter α: it will be localized on the Planck brane for α > 1, on the TeV brane for α < 1 and delocalized for α = 1. The author of ref. [11] points out that the Planck localized case can provide the required hierarchy. However, we find a different rescaling of the coupling of the quartic selfinteraction of the singlet field λ S when reducing from five to four dimensions, with crucial consequences for the physics conclusion. The coupling λ S rescales as follows where and, for α > 1, kr 1 λ S = λ S M 2 P N 1 0 = 1 1 4π 2 R 2 N0 4 e 4(1 α)kπr (4.1) N 2 0(α > 1,kR 1) 2(1 α)kπr e 2(1 α)kπr 1 (4.2) 1 2(α 1)kπR. (4.3) 5 A rescaling of a quartic interaction in going from the 5D to the 4D action of the singlet scalar field seems to be missing in ref. [11] 15
17 For α > 1 all couplings of the 5D potential rescale as follows λ H = λ H λt = λ T λs = λ S MP 2 k 2 (α 1) 2 e 4(α 1)kπR k η = η ξ = ξ α 1 e (α 1)kπR M P χ i = χ i (α 1) k M P e 2(α 1)kπR i = 1,2 µ 2 H,T = µ 2 H,Tk 2 e 2kπR, (4.4) where the first line contains all quartic selfinteractions, and the remaining two lines contain the couplings of the allowed mixed interactions of singlet, triplet and doublet, η,ξ,χ 1,2 and the doublet and triplet masses µ H,T. For k M P the warped geometry is providing a suppression of the couplings. Denoting with A the suppression factor A = k 2(α 1) e (1 α)kπr α > 1 M P A = k 2(1 α) α < 1 M P 1 A = α = 1, (4.5) krmp we obtain λ S = A 4 λ S, χ 1,2 = A 2 χ 1,2 and ξ = Aξ, thus providing the hierarchy of couplings λ S χ 1,2 ξ. Once the hierarchy of couplings is obtained, the solutions of the equations which minimize the complete potential will provide the hierarchy of the associated vevs. The set of coupled equations 2 λ H v 3 +v( µ 2 H + ηξ2 0 + ξs 0 ξ 0 + χ 2 S 2 0 ) = 0 4 λ T ξ ξ 0( µ 2 T + ηv2 + χ 1 S 2 0 )+ ξs 0 v 2 = 0 4 λ S S S 0( χ 1 ξ χ 2v 2 )+ ξξ 0 v 2 = 0 (4.6) can be easily analyzed without the need for an exact solution. From the third equation, by assuming ξ 0 v we get ξ 0 AS 0 and S 0 v/a, thus enhanced! The second equation, using S 0 v/a, implies that ξ 0 v is the only allowed non trivial solution. Therefore, the produced hierarchy is S 0 ve (α 1)kπR v and ξ 0 v. This conclusion is completely in agreement with the fact that once the singlet field is localized on the Planck brane, it has to acquire a vev of order the Planck scale. Unfortunately, this also means that no mechanism is left to provide a suppressed triplet vev on the visible brane via the addition of a singlet bulk scalar field with selfinteracting potential. The cases of a delocalized and TeVlocalized singlet field are also not relevant to our purpose. For α = 1, a powerlike enhancement of the singlet field S 0 krv is generated, while again ξ 0 v. For α < 1 no hierarchy is produced, with S 0 ξ 0 v. 5. Conclusions In the context of warped extra dimensions, we have explored the possibility of imposing boundary conditions on the bulk fermion fields which mix fields and their charge conjugate 16
18 under a Z 2 parity transformation involving the warped extra dimension. We have called these unordinary boundary conditions pseudomajorana conditions, since they induce the usual Majorana constraint on spinors in four dimensions. They can be written as ψ(x, y) = e iδ γ 5 ψ c (x,y), (5.1) where a phase factor is allowed in the most general case. This is a particular case of a general analysis proposed in [14] in the case of universal flat extra dimensions. The warped geometry with orbifolding induces peculiar behaviours of the allowed spectrum of fermion fields obtained in the reduction from five to four dimensions via the usual Kaluza Klein decomposition. In particular, we have shown that the pseudomajorana boundary conditions generate a KaluzaKlein tower of Majorana spinors in the four dimensional action. No Dirac type bulk mass term seems to be allowed by these boundary conditions embedded in the warped geometry with orbifolding. Thephasefactor e iδ in the pseudomajorana boundaryconditions must be chosen along with the choice of the phase in the 4D charge conjugation matrix. A massless zero mode exists and all KaluzaKlein modes, including the zero mode, are localized on the visible (y = πr) brane. We have also noticed that a particular choice of the phase factor e iδ forbids all excited states and only allows for a zero mode solution. The ydependent wave functions of the Majorana KaluzaKlein tower are plane waves deformed by the warped geometry. These results show that the case of bulk fermion fields with pseudomajorana boundary conditions is far more constrained than the ordinary Dirac case. No tuning of a localization mechanism via the bulk mass term is allowed in the Majorana case. It remains interesting the possibility to generalize these boundary conditions allowing for a superposition of ψ and ψ c after a Z 2 transformation. There is also the option of adding a bulk Majorana mass term, analogously to ref. [9]. But again, the mass parameter will acquire opposite Z 2 parity with respect to the ordinary case if pseudomajorana boundary conditions are imposed. Bulk Majorana spinors can be naturally identified with sterile neutrinos with masses of order the weak scale or with a massless Majorana Standard Model neutrino. Finally, after reconsidering a derivation proposed in [11], we have shown that an additional bulk singlet scalar field cannot induce a suppression of a Higgs triplet vev w.r.t. a Higgs doublet vev both confined on the visible brane. Unfortunately, our conclusion seems to rule out the possibility that a singlet bulk scalar field could induce a small mass for a Standard Model Majorana neutrino via the Yukawa interaction with a Higgs triplet. Although we suspect that this result extends to more general choices of scalar fields and their interactions, an interesting task is still the one of generating small Majorana masses through a hierarchy of scalar vevs, possibly induced by the geometry of extra dimensions. 5.1 Acknowledgments We aknowledge interesting discussions with Eric Bergshoeff, Mees de Roo, Avihay Kadosh, Jos Postma, Duurt Johan van der Hoek, and correpondence with MC. Chen. 17
19 References [1] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370; [2] N. ArkaniHamed, S. Dimoupoulos, G. Dvali, PLB 429 (1998) 263; I. Antoniadis, N. ArkaniHamed, S. Dimoupoulos, G. Dvali, PLB 436 (1998) 257. [3] N. ArkaniHamed, S. Dimoupoulos, G. Dvali and J. MarchRussell,Phys.Rev. D65 (2002) ; N. ArkaniHamed, M. Schmaltz, PRD 61 (2000) [4] G. Dvali and A. Yu. Smirnov,Nucl.Phys. B563 (1999) hepph/ [5] R. N. Mohapatra and A. PérezLorenzana,Nucl.Phys. B576 (2000) [6] M. Gogberashvili, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D11 (2002) [7] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) [8] Y. Grossman and M. Neubert, Phys.Lett. B474 (2000) hepph/ [9] S.J. Huber and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. B583 (2004) [10] S.J. Huber and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. B544 (2002) [11] MC. Chen, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) [12] T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B586 (2000) [13] T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B602 (2001) [14] B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Phys.Rev. D72 (2005) [15] P. Horava and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B475 (1996) [16] A. Van Proeyen, Tools for supersymmetry, Lectures in the spring school in Calimanesti, Romania, April 1998 [arxiv:hepth/ ]. [17] J. Scherk, Extended supersymmetry and extended supergravity theories, in Recent Developments in gravitation, ed. M. Lévy and S. Deser (Plenum Press, N.Y., 1979), p [18] T. Kugo and P. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B221 (1983) 357. [19] V. Barger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 692. [20] T.P.Cheng and L.F. Li, Phys. Rev. D22 (1980) [21] G.L. Fogli et al., Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) ; G.L. Fogli et al., arxiv: [hepph]; G.L. Fogli et al., arxiv: [hepph]. [22] G.G. Volkov, Geometry of the Majorana neutrino and New Symmetries, Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 31 number 23, 2006, p. 227 [arxiv:hepph/ ]. [23] G. Dando et al., Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) ; A. Davidson et al., Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) [24] L. Hall, H. Murayama and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) [25] K. Brakke, Neutrino masses in warped extra dimensions as an alternative to the seesaw mechanism, Master Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Internal Report 353, January
Introduction to SME and Scattering Theory. Don Colladay. New College of Florida Sarasota, FL, 34243, U.S.A.
June 2012 Introduction to SME and Scattering Theory Don Colladay New College of Florida Sarasota, FL, 34243, U.S.A. This lecture was given at the IUCSS summer school during June of 2012. It contains a
More informationTheoretical Particle Physics FYTN04: Oral Exam Questions, version ht15
Theoretical Particle Physics FYTN04: Oral Exam Questions, version ht15 Examples of The questions are roughly ordered by chapter but are often connected across the different chapters. Ordering is as in
More informationSTRING THEORY: Past, Present, and Future
STRING THEORY: Past, Present, and Future John H. Schwarz Simons Center March 25, 2014 1 OUTLINE I) Early History and Basic Concepts II) String Theory for Unification III) Superstring Revolutions IV) Remaining
More informationStandard Model of Particle Physics
Standard Model of Particle Physics Chris Sachrajda School of Physics and Astronomy University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK SUSSP61, St Andrews August 8th 3rd 006 Contents 1. Spontaneous Symmetry
More informationA SUSY SO(10) GUT with 2 Intermediate Scales
A SUSY SO(10) GUT with 2 Intermediate Scales Manuel Drees Bonn University & Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics SUSY SO(10) p. 1/25 Contents 1 Motivation: SO(10), intermediate scales SUSY SO(10) p. 2/25
More informationLocalization of scalar fields on Branes with an Asymmetric geometries in the bulk
Localization of scalar fields on Branes with an Asymmetric geometries in the bulk Vladimir A. Andrianov in collaboration with Alexandr A. Andrianov V.A.Fock Department of Theoretical Physics SanktPetersburg
More informationPhysics Department, Southampton University Highfield, Southampton, S09 5NH, U.K.
\ \ IFT Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista July/92 IFTP.025/92 LEPTON MASSES IN AN SU(Z) L U(1) N GAUGE MODEL R. Foot a, O.F. Hernandez ", F. Pisano e, and V. Pleitez 0 Physics
More informationState of Stress at Point
State of Stress at Point Einstein Notation The basic idea of Einstein notation is that a covector and a vector can form a scalar: This is typically written as an explicit sum: According to this convention,
More informationGauge theories and the standard model of elementary particle physics
Gauge theories and the standard model of elementary particle physics Mark Hamilton 21st July 2014 1 / 35 Table of contents 1 The standard model 2 3 2 / 35 The standard model The standard model is the most
More informationSUSY Breaking and Axino Cosmology
SUSY Breaking and Axino Cosmology Masahiro Yamaguchi Tohoku University Nov. 10, 2010 ExDiP2010@KEK, Japan 1. Introduction Fine Tuning Problems of Particle Physics Smallness of electroweak scale Smallness
More informationReflection Positivity of the Free Overlap Fermions
Yoshio Kikukawa Institute of Physics, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1538902, Japan Email: kikukawa@hep1.c.utokyo.ac.jp Department of Physics, the University of Tokyo 1130033, Japan Institute for the
More information4.5 Linear Dependence and Linear Independence
4.5 Linear Dependence and Linear Independence 267 32. {v 1, v 2 }, where v 1, v 2 are collinear vectors in R 3. 33. Prove that if S and S are subsets of a vector space V such that S is a subset of S, then
More informationMATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS
MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS Systems of Equations and Matrices Representation of a linear system The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a x + a 2 x 2 + + a n x n b a
More informationParticle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 7 : Symmetries and the Quark Model. Introduction/Aims
Particle Physics Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson Handout 7 : Symmetries and the Quark Model Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 206 Introduction/Aims Symmetries play a central role in particle physics;
More informationLecture L222D Rigid Body Dynamics: Work and Energy
J. Peraire, S. Widnall 6.07 Dynamics Fall 008 Version.0 Lecture L  D Rigid Body Dynamics: Work and Energy In this lecture, we will revisit the principle of work and energy introduced in lecture L3 for
More informationMechanics 1: Conservation of Energy and Momentum
Mechanics : Conservation of Energy and Momentum If a certain quantity associated with a system does not change in time. We say that it is conserved, and the system possesses a conservation law. Conservation
More informationGauged supergravity and E 10
Gauged supergravity and E 10 Jakob Palmkvist AlbertEinsteinInstitut in collaboration with Eric Bergshoeff, Olaf Hohm, Axel Kleinschmidt, Hermann Nicolai and Teake Nutma arxiv:0810.5767 JHEP01(2009)020
More informationThe elements used in commercial codes can be classified in two basic categories:
CHAPTER 3 Truss Element 3.1 Introduction The single most important concept in understanding FEA, is the basic understanding of various finite elements that we employ in an analysis. Elements are used for
More information2.2 Magic with complex exponentials
2.2. MAGIC WITH COMPLEX EXPONENTIALS 97 2.2 Magic with complex exponentials We don t really know what aspects of complex variables you learned about in high school, so the goal here is to start more or
More informationA Theory for the Cosmological Constant and its Explanation of the Gravitational Constant
A Theory for the Cosmological Constant and its Explanation of the Gravitational Constant H.M.Mok Radiation Health Unit, 3/F., Saiwanho Health Centre, Hong Kong SAR Govt, 8 Tai Hong St., Saiwanho, Hong
More information88 CHAPTER 2. VECTOR FUNCTIONS. . First, we need to compute T (s). a By definition, r (s) T (s) = 1 a sin s a. sin s a, cos s a
88 CHAPTER. VECTOR FUNCTIONS.4 Curvature.4.1 Definitions and Examples The notion of curvature measures how sharply a curve bends. We would expect the curvature to be 0 for a straight line, to be very small
More informationFigure 1.1 Vector A and Vector F
CHAPTER I VECTOR QUANTITIES Quantities are anything which can be measured, and stated with number. Quantities in physics are divided into two types; scalar and vector quantities. Scalar quantities have
More informationSCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND LORENTZ VIOLATION DON COLLADAY
SCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND LORENTZ VIOLATION DON COLLADAY New College of Florida, 5700 Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL 34243, USA Email: colladay@sar.usf.edu To date, a significant effort has been made
More informationElasticity Theory Basics
G22.3033002: Topics in Computer Graphics: Lecture #7 Geometric Modeling New York University Elasticity Theory Basics Lecture #7: 20 October 2003 Lecturer: Denis Zorin Scribe: Adrian Secord, Yotam Gingold
More informationThe Matrix Elements of a 3 3 Orthogonal Matrix Revisited
Physics 116A Winter 2011 The Matrix Elements of a 3 3 Orthogonal Matrix Revisited 1. Introduction In a class handout entitled, ThreeDimensional Proper and Improper Rotation Matrices, I provided a derivation
More information2 Session Two  Complex Numbers and Vectors
PH2011 Physics 2A Maths Revision  Session 2: Complex Numbers and Vectors 1 2 Session Two  Complex Numbers and Vectors 2.1 What is a Complex Number? The material on complex numbers should be familiar
More informationNonSupersymmetric Seiberg Duality in orientifold QCD and NonCritical Strings
NonSupersymmetric Seiberg Duality in orientifold QCD and NonCritical Strings, IAP Large N@Swansea, July 2009 A. Armoni, D.I., G. Moraitis and V. Niarchos, arxiv:0801.0762 Introduction IR dynamics of
More information1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics
1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics 1.1 Basic notions of operator algebra. In the previous lectures we have met operators: ˆx and ˆp = i h they are called fundamental operators. Many operators
More informationASEN 3112  Structures. MDOF Dynamic Systems. ASEN 3112 Lecture 1 Slide 1
19 MDOF Dynamic Systems ASEN 3112 Lecture 1 Slide 1 A TwoDOF MassSpringDashpot Dynamic System Consider the lumpedparameter, massspringdashpot dynamic system shown in the Figure. It has two point
More informationChapter 7  Roots, Radicals, and Complex Numbers
Math 233  Spring 2009 Chapter 7  Roots, Radicals, and Complex Numbers 7.1 Roots and Radicals 7.1.1 Notation and Terminology In the expression x the is called the radical sign. The expression under the
More informationEffective actions for fluids from holography
Effective actions for fluids from holography Based on: arxiv:1405.4243 and arxiv:1504.07616 with Michal Heller and Natalia Pinzani Fokeeva Jan de Boer, Amsterdam Benasque, July 21, 2015 (see also arxiv:1504.07611
More informationx 2 + y 2 = 1 y 1 = x 2 + 2x y = x 2 + 2x + 1
Implicit Functions Defining Implicit Functions Up until now in this course, we have only talked about functions, which assign to every real number x in their domain exactly one real number f(x). The graphs
More informationarxiv:hepph/0109048v3 26 Jan 2002
arxiv:hepph/0109048v3 26 Jan 2002 Manifestations of Extra Dimensions in a Neutrino Telescope A. Nicolaidis and D.T. Papadamou Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Thessaloniki, GR54006 Thessaloniki,
More informationAP PHYSICS C Mechanics  SUMMER ASSIGNMENT FOR 20162017
AP PHYSICS C Mechanics  SUMMER ASSIGNMENT FOR 20162017 Dear Student: The AP physics course you have signed up for is designed to prepare you for a superior performance on the AP test. To complete material
More informationarxiv:hepth/0409006v3 21 Sep 2004
IUBTH411 Nonabelian black strings Betti Hartmann School of Engineering and Sciences, International University Bremen (IUB, 28725 Bremen, Germany (Dated: December 23, 213 arxiv:hepth/496v3 21 Sep 24
More informationMonodromies, Fluxes, and Compact ThreeGeneration Ftheory GUTs
arxiv:0906.4672 CALT682733 Monodromies, Fluxes, and Compact ThreeGeneration Ftheory GUTs arxiv:0906.4672v2 [hepth] 1 Jul 2009 Joseph Marsano, Natalia Saulina, and Sakura SchäferNameki California
More informationAnalysis of Stresses and Strains
Chapter 7 Analysis of Stresses and Strains 7.1 Introduction axial load = P / A torsional load in circular shaft = T / I p bending moment and shear force in beam = M y / I = V Q / I b in this chapter, we
More informationChapter 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Hans de Vries
Chapter 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory Hans de Vries January 2, 2009 2 Chapter Contents 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities
More informationChapter 2. Parameterized Curves in R 3
Chapter 2. Parameterized Curves in R 3 Def. A smooth curve in R 3 is a smooth map σ : (a, b) R 3. For each t (a, b), σ(t) R 3. As t increases from a to b, σ(t) traces out a curve in R 3. In terms of components,
More informationMATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m
MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS 1. SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES 1.1. Representation of a linear system. The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 +
More informationAxion/Saxion Cosmology Revisited
Axion/Saxion Cosmology Revisited Masahiro Yamaguchi (Tohoku University) Based on Nakamura, Okumura, MY, PRD77 ( 08) and Work in Progress 1. Introduction Fine Tuning Problems of Particle Physics Smallness
More informationChapter 18 Static Equilibrium
Chapter 8 Static Equilibrium 8. Introduction Static Equilibrium... 8. Lever Law... Example 8. Lever Law... 4 8.3 Generalized Lever Law... 5 8.4 Worked Examples... 7 Example 8. Suspended Rod... 7 Example
More informationAlgebra 2 Chapter 1 Vocabulary. identity  A statement that equates two equivalent expressions.
Chapter 1 Vocabulary identity  A statement that equates two equivalent expressions. verbal model A word equation that represents a reallife problem. algebraic expression  An expression with variables.
More informationThe Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb
The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb The Importance of the Harmonic Oscillator The quantum harmonic oscillator holds a unique importance in quantum mechanics, as it is both one of the few problems
More informationarxiv:1201.6059v2 [physics.classph] 27 Aug 2012
Green s functions for Neumann boundary conditions Jerrold Franklin Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122682 arxiv:121.659v2 [physics.classph] 27 Aug 212 (Dated: August 28,
More informationLecture L3  Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations
S. Widnall 16.07 Dynamics Fall 2009 Lecture notes based on J. Peraire Version 2.0 Lecture L3  Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations By using vectors and defining appropriate operations between
More informationIntroduction to Matrix Algebra
Psychology 7291: Multivariate Statistics (Carey) 8/27/98 Matrix Algebra  1 Introduction to Matrix Algebra Definitions: A matrix is a collection of numbers ordered by rows and columns. It is customary
More informationCopyright 2011 Casa Software Ltd. www.casaxps.com. Centre of Mass
Centre of Mass A central theme in mathematical modelling is that of reducing complex problems to simpler, and hopefully, equivalent problems for which mathematical analysis is possible. The concept of
More informationPhysics 9e/Cutnell. correlated to the. College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives
Physics 9e/Cutnell correlated to the College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives Big Idea 1: Objects and systems have properties such as mass and charge. Systems may have internal structure. Enduring
More informationTrigonometric Functions and Equations
Contents Trigonometric Functions and Equations Lesson 1 Reasoning with Trigonometric Functions Investigations 1 Proving Trigonometric Identities... 271 2 Sum and Difference Identities... 276 3 Extending
More informationMATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An ndimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.
MATH10212 Linear Algebra Textbook: D. Poole, Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Thompson, 2006. ISBN 0534405967. Systems of Linear Equations Definition. An ndimensional vector is a row or a column
More informationSolutions to Homework 10
Solutions to Homework 1 Section 7., exercise # 1 (b,d): (b) Compute the value of R f dv, where f(x, y) = y/x and R = [1, 3] [, 4]. Solution: Since f is continuous over R, f is integrable over R. Let x
More informationSecond Order Linear Differential Equations
CHAPTER 2 Second Order Linear Differential Equations 2.. Homogeneous Equations A differential equation is a relation involving variables x y y y. A solution is a function f x such that the substitution
More informationP.A.M. Dirac Received May 29, 1931
P.A.M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 133, 60 1931 Quantised Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field P.A.M. Dirac Received May 29, 1931 1. Introduction The steady progress of physics requires for its theoretical
More informationNOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS
NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS Definition 1. Let V and W be vector spaces. A function T : V W is a linear transformation from V to W if the following two properties hold. i T v + v = T v + T v for all
More informationMathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces
Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 19967 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are
More informationRotation: Moment of Inertia and Torque
Rotation: Moment of Inertia and Torque Every time we push a door open or tighten a bolt using a wrench, we apply a force that results in a rotational motion about a fixed axis. Through experience we learn
More informationThe Basics of FEA Procedure
CHAPTER 2 The Basics of FEA Procedure 2.1 Introduction This chapter discusses the spring element, especially for the purpose of introducing various concepts involved in use of the FEA technique. A spring
More information15.062 Data Mining: Algorithms and Applications Matrix Math Review
.6 Data Mining: Algorithms and Applications Matrix Math Review The purpose of this document is to give a brief review of selected linear algebra concepts that will be useful for the course and to develop
More informationGenerally Covariant Quantum Mechanics
Chapter 15 Generally Covariant Quantum Mechanics by Myron W. Evans, Alpha Foundation s Institutute for Advance Study (AIAS). (emyrone@oal.com, www.aias.us, www.atomicprecision.com) Dedicated to the Late
More informationChapter 15 Collision Theory
Chapter 15 Collision Theory 151 Introduction 1 15 Reference Frames Relative and Velocities 1 151 Center of Mass Reference Frame 15 Relative Velocities 3 153 Characterizing Collisions 5 154 OneDimensional
More informationDERIVATIVES AS MATRICES; CHAIN RULE
DERIVATIVES AS MATRICES; CHAIN RULE 1. Derivatives of Realvalued Functions Let s first consider functions f : R 2 R. Recall that if the partial derivatives of f exist at the point (x 0, y 0 ), then we
More information1 Solving LPs: The Simplex Algorithm of George Dantzig
Solving LPs: The Simplex Algorithm of George Dantzig. Simplex Pivoting: Dictionary Format We illustrate a general solution procedure, called the simplex algorithm, by implementing it on a very simple example.
More informationLS.6 Solution Matrices
LS.6 Solution Matrices In the literature, solutions to linear systems often are expressed using square matrices rather than vectors. You need to get used to the terminology. As before, we state the definitions
More informationarxiv:condmat/9301024v1 20 Jan 1993 ABSTRACT
Anyons as Dirac Strings, the A x = 0 Gauge LPTB 931 John McCabe Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, 1 Université Bordeaux I 19 rue du Solarium, 33175 Gradignan FRANCE arxiv:condmat/930104v1 0 Jan 1993
More informationAppendix A: Science Practices for AP Physics 1 and 2
Appendix A: Science Practices for AP Physics 1 and 2 Science Practice 1: The student can use representations and models to communicate scientific phenomena and solve scientific problems. The real world
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationarxiv:1404.6042v1 [math.dg] 24 Apr 2014
Angle Bisectors of a Triangle in Lorentzian Plane arxiv:1404.604v1 [math.dg] 4 Apr 014 Joseph Cho August 5, 013 Abstract In Lorentzian geometry, limited definition of angles restricts the use of angle
More informationFeynman diagrams. 1 Aim of the game 2
Feynman diagrams Contents 1 Aim of the game 2 2 Rules 2 2.1 Vertices................................ 3 2.2 Antiparticles............................. 3 2.3 Distinct diagrams...........................
More informationLecture 18  Clifford Algebras and Spin groups
Lecture 18  Clifford Algebras and Spin groups April 5, 2013 Reference: Lawson and Michelsohn, Spin Geometry. 1 Universal Property If V is a vector space over R or C, let q be any quadratic form, meaning
More informationStructural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments
Structural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments Positive Internal Forces Acting Recall from mechanics of materials that the internal forces P (generic axial), V (shear) and M (moment) represent resultants
More informationNEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS TEST DESIGN AND FRAMEWORK September 2014 Authorized for Distribution by the New York State Education Department This test design and framework document
More informationInfrared Spectroscopy: Theory
u Chapter 15 Infrared Spectroscopy: Theory An important tool of the organic chemist is Infrared Spectroscopy, or IR. IR spectra are acquired on a special instrument, called an IR spectrometer. IR is used
More informationLinear Algebra: Vectors
A Linear Algebra: Vectors A Appendix A: LINEAR ALGEBRA: VECTORS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A Motivation A 3 A2 Vectors A 3 A2 Notational Conventions A 4 A22 Visualization A 5 A23 Special Vectors A 5 A3 Vector
More informationSecond Order Linear Partial Differential Equations. Part I
Second Order Linear Partial Differential Equations Part I Second linear partial differential equations; Separation of Variables;  point boundary value problems; Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions Introduction
More informationLectures notes on orthogonal matrices (with exercises) 92.222  Linear Algebra II  Spring 2004 by D. Klain
Lectures notes on orthogonal matrices (with exercises) 92.222  Linear Algebra II  Spring 2004 by D. Klain 1. Orthogonal matrices and orthonormal sets An n n realvalued matrix A is said to be an orthogonal
More informationSouth Carolina College and CareerReady (SCCCR) PreCalculus
South Carolina College and CareerReady (SCCCR) PreCalculus Key Concepts Arithmetic with Polynomials and Rational Expressions PC.AAPR.2 PC.AAPR.3 PC.AAPR.4 PC.AAPR.5 PC.AAPR.6 PC.AAPR.7 Standards Know
More informationREALIZING EINSTEIN S DREAM Exploring Our Mysterious Universe
REALIZING EINSTEIN S DREAM Exploring Our Mysterious Universe The End of Physics Albert A. Michelson, at the dedication of Ryerson Physics Lab, U. of Chicago, 1894 The Miracle Year  1905 Relativity Quantum
More informationarxiv:1008.4792v2 [hepph] 20 Jun 2013
A Note on the IR Finiteness of Fermion Loop Diagrams Ambresh Shivaji HarishChandra Research Initute, Chhatnag Road, Junsi, Allahabad09, India arxiv:008.479v hepph] 0 Jun 03 Abract We show that the mo
More informationA QUICK GUIDE TO THE FORMULAS OF MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS
A QUIK GUIDE TO THE FOMULAS OF MULTIVAIABLE ALULUS ontents 1. Analytic Geometry 2 1.1. Definition of a Vector 2 1.2. Scalar Product 2 1.3. Properties of the Scalar Product 2 1.4. Length and Unit Vectors
More informationHow NOT to do a data analysis
How NOT to do a data analysis The Physics case: neutrinoless double beta decay The experimental apparatus The reported results A critical review of the analysis The ROOT code A. Fontana and P. Pedroni
More informationThis unit will lay the groundwork for later units where the students will extend this knowledge to quadratic and exponential functions.
Algebra I Overview View unit yearlong overview here Many of the concepts presented in Algebra I are progressions of concepts that were introduced in grades 6 through 8. The content presented in this course
More informationRate Equations and Detailed Balance
Rate Equations and Detailed Balance Initial question: Last time we mentioned astrophysical masers. Why can they exist spontaneously? Could there be astrophysical lasers, i.e., ones that emit in the optical?
More information9.4. The Scalar Product. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Style. Learning Outcomes
The Scalar Product 9.4 Introduction There are two kinds of multiplication involving vectors. The first is known as the scalar product or dot product. This is socalled because when the scalar product of
More informationMATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 9: Subspaces of vector spaces (continued). Span. Spanning set.
MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 9: Subspaces of vector spaces (continued). Span. Spanning set. Vector space A vector space is a set V equipped with two operations, addition V V (x,y) x + y V and scalar
More informationWorld of Particles Big Bang Thomas Gajdosik. Big Bang (model)
Big Bang (model) What can be seen / measured? basically only light (and a few particles: e ±, p, p, ν x ) in different wave lengths: microwave to γrays in different intensities (measured in magnitudes)
More information1 Symmetries of regular polyhedra
1230, notes 5 1 Symmetries of regular polyhedra Symmetry groups Recall: Group axioms: Suppose that (G, ) is a group and a, b, c are elements of G. Then (i) a b G (ii) (a b) c = a (b c) (iii) There is an
More informationCreating, Solving, and Graphing Systems of Linear Equations and Linear Inequalities
Algebra 1, Quarter 2, Unit 2.1 Creating, Solving, and Graphing Systems of Linear Equations and Linear Inequalities Overview Number of instructional days: 15 (1 day = 45 60 minutes) Content to be learned
More informationChapter 9 Unitary Groups and SU(N)
Chapter 9 Unitary Groups and SU(N) The irreducible representations of SO(3) are appropriate for describing the degeneracies of states of quantum mechanical systems which have rotational symmetry in three
More informationANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ENGINEERS
UNIT 1: Unit code: QCF Level: 4 Credit value: 15 ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ENGINEERS A/601/1401 OUTCOME  TRIGONOMETRIC METHODS TUTORIAL 1 SINUSOIDAL FUNCTION Be able to analyse and model engineering situations
More informationUnified Lecture # 4 Vectors
Fall 2005 Unified Lecture # 4 Vectors These notes were written by J. Peraire as a review of vectors for Dynamics 16.07. They have been adapted for Unified Engineering by R. Radovitzky. References [1] Feynmann,
More informationDifferential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation
Differential Relations for Fluid Flow In this approach, we apply our four basic conservation laws to an infinitesimally small control volume. The differential approach provides point by point details of
More informationLinear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus
Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus ndimensional Euclidean Space and Matrices Definition of n space As was learned in Math b, a point in Euclidean three space can be thought of
More informationFinite Element Formulation for Plates  Handout 3 
Finite Element Formulation for Plates  Handout 3  Dr Fehmi Cirak (fc286@) Completed Version Definitions A plate is a three dimensional solid body with one of the plate dimensions much smaller than the
More informationx1 x 2 x 3 y 1 y 2 y 3 x 1 y 2 x 2 y 1 0.
Cross product 1 Chapter 7 Cross product We are getting ready to study integration in several variables. Until now we have been doing only differential calculus. One outcome of this study will be our ability
More informationPhysics 111: Lecture 4: Chapter 4  Forces and Newton s Laws of Motion. Physics is about forces and how the world around us reacts to these forces.
Physics 111: Lecture 4: Chapter 4  Forces and Newton s Laws of Motion Physics is about forces and how the world around us reacts to these forces. Whats a force? Contact and noncontact forces. Whats a
More informationPresenting limits of simplified dark matter models from collider searches in. 0 m DM planes and selfannihilation crosssections.
Internal working document not intended for broader distribution Presenting limits of simplified dark matter models from collider searches in SD/SI m DM planes and selfannihilation crosssections. Oliver
More informationBending Stress in Beams
93673600 Bending Stress in Beams Derive a relationship for bending stress in a beam: Basic Assumptions:. Deflections are very small with respect to the depth of the beam. Plane sections before bending
More informationTopologically Massive Gravity with a Cosmological Constant
Topologically Massive Gravity with a Cosmological Constant Derek K. Wise Joint work with S. Carlip, S. Deser, A. Waldron Details and references at arxiv:0803.3998 [hepth] (or for the short story, 0807.0486,
More informationHøgskolen i Narvik Sivilingeniørutdanningen STE6237 ELEMENTMETODER. Oppgaver
Høgskolen i Narvik Sivilingeniørutdanningen STE637 ELEMENTMETODER Oppgaver Klasse: 4.ID, 4.IT Ekstern Professor: Gregory A. Chechkin email: chechkin@mech.math.msu.su Narvik 6 PART I Task. Consider twopoint
More information